Pilots

gaps become governed questions synthetic demo data

Spring barley × reduced N — no comparable evidence exists

absence stays absence, never a claim · converting creates a governed question, not a marketing exercise

Winter wheat × organic management context — below k=5

2 records exist · aggregate withheld · a pilot would build the compatible group honestly

Pilot P-07 · spring barley × biological seed treatment PRF-UK-M-003021

outcomes 2 of 6 measured

Born from the evidence-gap map · 6 sites · sponsorship disclosed on every record (product and protocol support supplied)

Protocol locked Sep 25 Actual events 6 of 6 drilled & treated Comparisons 6 reference arms live Outcomes 2 measured · 4 at harvest Evidence pack assembles when measured
Open pilot record Protocol & milestone evidence pack

Whatever the six outcomes show — favourable, adverse or null — all of them enter the portfolio. That is the deal that makes a pilot credible.

Pilot P-08 · OSR establishment context

early · first observations logging
Question
Does the treatment change OSR establishment counts under min-till, against an untreated arm?
State
protocol agreed · reference arm defined · 3 of 5 sites recruited · counting protocol fixed before drilling
Disclosure
product supplied · recorded on every site's records
Pilot rules: a pilot is a governed record chain — protocol, actual events, comparison, outcome, evidence — with sponsorship disclosed throughout. Results enter the portfolio whatever they show; synthetic activity is never presented as adoption or traction.